
In case you haven’t heard, Andray Blatche has been doing pretty damn well lately. This sparked a recent Twitter debate amongst a couple of the better NBA writers on the ‘net.
Mike Prada of Bullets Forever has suddenly elevated Blatche to one of the best power forwards in the league (in terms of who you’d want on your team over the next five seasons). The only players Prada would take over Blatche is Josh Smith, Kevin Love, Chris Bosh, Blake Griffin and Pau Gasol. This is, of course, factoring in value of play and value of contract.
Tom Ziller, of several places all over the Interweb, but most notably SacTown Royalty and NBA FanHouse, seems to disagree, wondering specifically about Al Jefferson, Carl Landry, J.J. Hickson, Michael Beasley and LaMarcus Aldridge, and saying that Prada is “in lonely company taking Blatche over any of them, let alone ALL of them.” The debate raged on.
The disclaimer is that my friend Mr. Prada has always been a bit over-amorous for Andray Blatche. I, on the other hand, have always been a bit too skeptical, perhaps unfairly so. Although, in my opinion, and since I’m writing this on my site, Blatche has always ‘made his own bed’, if you will, (and I’m not taking about when he got caught soliciting an undercover cop he thought was a prostitute), with his inconsistent play that has often derived from lack of conditioning, focus and a commitment to the game.
But the guy is still young and finding his way. This season, often times I’ve come around on Blatche. Other times not so much. Flip Saunders has openly expressed frustration that Blatche tends to float away from the rim, and of course, when he tries to do playground dribbles behind his back. Hence, because of Andray’s penchant for inconsistency, it’s way too early to judge his future on these past couple of games. And Mr. Prada would agree with me. However, the start is extremely promising for Wizards fans. As Prada notes, Blatche’s pace-adjusted numbers per 36 minutes over the last ten (10) games are as follows: 23.3 points, 9 rebounds, 2.1 turnovers, 26.3 PER, 59.6 true-shooting percentage, 55.5 effective field-goal percentage.
Read more »