I definitely meant to get the episode 3 write-up out before episode 4 came on, but time is a muther. Episode 4 was great though, you can really see everything coming together. My goal is to get some thoughts on it posted by Monday night.
[the wire: season 5, episode 1 write-up - "more with less"]
[the wire: season 5, episode 2 write-up - "unconfirmed reports"]
In talking about The Wire with my friend Chris in a DC coffee-shop, specifically episode 2 of this season, we both came to the conclusion that this McNulty crime-scene tampering scheme left a bit of a bad taste in our mouths. Is this plausible? It just seems too risky, too half-baked…or with McNulty, half-Jamesoned. By all means, I have faith in the writing. This captivating series has got me enthralled to this point, so a little faith on my part is justified. But it seems like they’re setting the bar a little high for themselves. However, in the end, Simon is giving us what we want.
The Wire needs to go out with a bang, leaving us satisfied. Personally, I have no problem with how the Sopranos ended. But with The Wire, David Simon wants to build a consensus. He doesn’t want his audience to focus on how the series ends, rather the topic of his work: the education system, police & crime, political structure, and the media’s connection to it all. The media, being the general publics connection to government services; it’s obvious that it would be the focus of the fifth and final season. At face value, season 2 at the docks doesn’t seem to fit into the equation. But if you don’t think the origin of the drug trade, labor union involvement, mob influence, and a statement on the nation’s trade are key factors in this epic, then I’m not sure why you are watching in the first place.
This girl asked me on Sunday, “The Wire? What’s that about.” My knee-jerk reaction was to say it was a cop show that takes place in Baltimore. Guess like Lupe Fiasco, I had to dumb it down. Next time I’ll say, as David Simon has put it, “It’s a show about an American city.”
Read more »